Conservation in democracies: The role of advocacy
By Dr. Jesus A. Rivas
June 2001
A week before the last
presidential elections in the
One of the levels is analyzing the candidates and guiding environmental constituents to vote for the environment. Why was it me, of all people, a foreigner, the one to ask SBC to begin involvement in discussion of how national politics affect conservation? I realize that the problem at the core of this debate may lay in the difference between policy and politics. While the authors and readers of Conservation Biology have supported involvement in environmental policies in order to accomplish the goals of conservation, many might still be reluctant to get involved in the politics of environmental conservation. However, politics is simply the way to make policies happen and the only way to promote action in a democratic system. Can we really get policies working without getting involved in the politics of the environment?
In a recent editorial
Whitten et al. (2001) debated how conservation biology has succeeded as a
science while failing with a loud thud in the very goals that it has set out to
accomplish. Not unlike a surgeon that performs an excellent surgical procedure
though the patient dies on the operation table. Why have we failed after doing
such a good job? I contend that we spend a great deal of effort developing good
environmental policies, but for lack of environmental politics, all our efforts
are lost. The fact that in the last presidential race in the
The other level of the dichotomy politics vs policy that I identify is in our teaching to our students. Should we address political issues when we talk about environment or should we stay in policies and ignore the politics around them? Should we identify the players of the different debates or should we shy away from it? For example, if we are talking about the residing hair line of the tropical forests around the world should we only identify demographic explosion on developing countries as one of the insurmountable problems, or shall we go the extra mile and inform the students that during the Reagan-Bush administration the US stopped all the economic help for family planning in the developing countries? Should we stop short of telling the students the whole truth because it might be a political issue or should we boldly bring the debate to the very core of the problem? This point is very important when we teach undergraduates considering that many of them, if they vote, they just tend vote for the party they were "born in" or are easily carried by popular campaign rhetoric. How many of us provide information to our students about the environmental record of the different candidates for various offices so they can make informed decisions? In my experience teaching senior biology majors, I was surprised at the low awareness of conservation politics and how their votes may affect the outcome of conservation effort. Not only this line of discussion was welcomed among the students but in addition after the course finished I keep receiving thank-you e-mails from my former students for what they learned in that style of discussions.
Conservation
biologist is a discipline of crisis and the solution for the crisis calls
constantly for newer actions. In the past we moved from pure science to working
in policies. Then, there was a fair amount of resistance among the most
conservative members of the scientific community that refused to move away from
the pure science paradigm. Currently most people agree that developing
environmental policies is a great part of our work. Now it is time to move also
to work in politics. Offering technical solutions is one of our
responsibilities but guiding environmental voters to make the best for the
environment with their votes is, in my view, another very important part of our
role. Being aware of the need for conservation voters, I find negligent not to
move in the direction to create them. Letīs consider
a medical Doctor that walks by a person bleeding in the street without doing
any attempt to help the person; we would probably think that it was
irresponsible. Are conservation biologists that are aware of the need for
voters to make pressure on the elected officials to pass legislation and
protect the environment but refuse to speak out for environment and
environmental politics doing an equivalent mistake? I would welcome responses
about our role in politics both as a society and as citizens
Literature Cited
Whitten T., Holmes, D., and K Mackinnon. 2001. Conservation biology: displacement behavior for academia? Conservation Biology 15: 1-3.